Skip to content
Clear Edition US

Could Additional Countries Pursue Australia's Lead in Banning Social Media for Under-16s?

The Australian bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel restrictions.

  • The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
  • Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
  • The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
  • In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the state level amid national gridlock.

  • Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
  • Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various figures to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.

By

Shannon Duncan

Elena Vance is a seasoned journalist and political analyst with over a decade of experience covering US domestic and foreign policy.

Clear Edition US

Type to search articles.